Tag Archives: Wag the Dog

Wag The Dog To Win The Election?

British intelligence says there is no “increased threat” from Iran. Nevertheless, the Trump Administration has a carrier task-force backed up by heavy bombers headed for the Persian Gulf and is reportedly considering sending in more than 100-thousand troops. Trump has also ordered the evacuation of all non-essential personnel from the U.S. Embassy in nearby Iraq.

The Republicans haven’t wagged the dog this hard since the W. Bush Administration was finding yellow cake in Niger and aluminum centrifuge tubes all over Iraq.

How many times are we going to fall for this same ploy? How many times are we going to let the Republicans take the country to war to win an election? How many times have you speculated that we would have been better off leaving Saddam in place, which would have meant no ISIS? Was Saddam that much worse than Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, who has imprisoned journalists, judges, and pretty much anybody who opposes his regime while he continues his war against our allies the Kurds?

It’s easy to forget that Saddam had our implicit support when he went to war with Iran, and that he would still be holding the Iranians in check had the Untied States not demonized him before invading his sovereign nation in the name of regime change. Sure, Saddam was a nasty guy, but preventing the formation of ISIS and holding Iran in check while eliminating the need for a massive deployment of U.S. troops is no small matter.

What George W. Bush said about “democratizing” all the of Middle East popped into my head the other day. One wonders how many in the current administration continue to believe that’s a good idea? How many there are who think that leaving our troops permanently scattered across the Middle East and North Africa at the U.S. taxpayers expense is a viable option? Presidential adviser John Bolton, is a known supporter of regime change in Iran. In simple terms, Bolton thinks it would be a good idea to invade another sovereign nation to overthrow another sitting government.

We never used to even contemplate doing that kind of thing unless a nation-state or other entity presented a clear and present danger to us or threatened a country with whom we had a mutual defense agreement. It just wasn’t what America did. We were better than that. Apparently that ended with Vietnam, another country we invaded based upon an apparent lie. More than 58,000 Americans died in that one. Sadly, documents and tapes in the Lyndon Johnson Presidential Library prove that Johnson had both the South and the North Vietnamese ready to sign a peace treaty, but that the deal died when Richard Nixon’s campaign convinced the South Vietnamese that it would be to their advantage to keep the war going until after Nixon was elected. It would be years later before a disgusted American public became so disenchanted with the unending war that they took to the streets and demanded that the military-industrial complex disengage.

When did the very idea of peace become unreachable while ongoing war feels like the norm? Something we simply cannot avoid? Do you suppose the profitability of war factors into any of this?

Which do you prefer? Educating our kids and giving the country a national healthcare program, or killing strangers on foreign soil? Why isn’t that even discussed? When did the very concept of peace become not just unfashionable, but un-American?

An “exit strategy” to pull our people out of the Middle-East and North Africa, has been all but forgotten, as has an actual long-term game plan for why we are still there. Also nearly forgotten is the growing gap between the rich and the poor, the need for national healthcare, the overwhelming need for campaign finance reform along with real immigration reform and the role the Russians played in rigging our last election.

War with Iran, might very well ensure our national lapse in memory continues long enough to get Donald Trump re-elected. Until then, the chaos this one man has created continues to provide Republicans with excellent cover to continue putting the self-interest of a relative few above the national interest of the many.

Our real enemies appear to be the Russians, who, our intelligence services tell us, continue plotting ways to rig our next election, and the Saudis, who have never stopped spreading a worldwide campaign of anti-American hatred. All the while, Donald Trump, in his infinite wisdom, is laying the groundwork for another war. The ultimate diversion heading into 2020.

Trump Wags The Dog?

So ABC News is reporting  exclusively that the Syrians anticipated the missile attack? Of course they did. The U.S. told the Russians we were going to launch, the Russians told their allies the Syrians, and we ended up attacking an old, abandoned airfield.

According to ABC, “Syrian military officials appeared to anticipate Thursday night’s raid on Syria‘s Shayrat air base, evacuating personnel and moving equipment ahead of the strike, according to an eyewitness.”

In other words, we blew up 59 Tomahawks, at a price of around $1.5 million each, for no good reason.  Other than maybe to divert attention from Donald Trump’s problems with “Russiagate” here at home.   Do ya think?

Very clever.   It made for some great tv news coverage though, with all that beautiful nighttime launch video from one of the ships provided by the Pentagon.   Well, they say it was video of the launch against Syria, but who really knows?  It was only a handout.  Maybe they just threw some old launch video together for……oh, you know…..national security reasons?   Whatever happened, CNN and MSNBC were off to the races, running the video over and over again while lining up interviews with every retired general and admiral they could get their hands on.

TV news loves pretty pictures and the glory of destruction helps support a pro-military stance, regardless of the motivation.

Anybody out there remember the movie “Wag The Dog?”  Too outrageous an idea, you say?   The more outrageous it is, the less likely anyone is to question Trump’s motivation.   He’ll just say you’re a conspiracy nut.   Even when the truth is sitting there right in front of you.

Do you trust Donald  J. Trump?

Apparently (I say “apparently,” because I was not there), we blew the hell out of an old, abandoned airfield, some almost ready for the junkyard jets and even gave the enemy warning, so that they could get their people and newer equipment out of the way in advance of our launch.    As a result, Russiagate is, for the moment, off the radar.   As for the future, how will anybody be able to question whether Trump is colluding or has colluded with the Russians, after his mighty air strike against their allies, the Syrians?  It’s almost comical.

This “air strike” appears to have been nothing but a big PR ploy to make Russiagate go away and maybe bump up Donald’s numbers a little.   Either that, or it was an emotional knee-jerk reaction by an unbalanced mind, which might be even worse.   On the face of it, it appears to have been the PR thing.   And so much of the media fell for it.

I feel like I’m back in the 60’s.   More of the media needs to return to their traditional role being professional skeptics who question authority.