An argument can be made (and it is) for Donald Trump having a more difficult time beating Bernie Sanders than Hillary Clinton. There are Hillary’s ties to Wall Street, her traditionally more centrist-Republican-like positions (before she stole much of Sander’s platform), and even Trump’s contribution to her fund. Or her husband’s fund? Whose fund is it? It has her name on it, right?
In May the Daily Mail reported, “Bill and Hillary Clinton have personally tried to shake Donald Trump’s money tree for large donations to their family foundation, according to the real estate billionaire. He told Daily Mail Online on Thursday during a New Hampshire campaign swing that he has given a six-figure total to the controversial philanthropy over the years, in response to the former first couple pestering him for contributions. Trump said that unlike foreign governments and companies at the center of a Clinton scandal, he never received any special government favors for his money and was never promised anything. ‘No,’ he said. ‘No. But they do kiss my *ss.'”
Thank that’ll be a problem?
Isn’t it the least bit peculiar that the DNC apparently stands in opposition to the democratic process? Would love to hear Wasserman Schultz explain that one away. David Gergen, has argued that some kind of “peer review” can be helpful or even necessary for the process. I couldn’t disagree more. Either you have a democratic process or you don’t. Right now, the Democratic Party, does not. And it’s shameful. There’s nothing super about “superdelegates.” Come on Democrats, clean up your act.