|The Daily Show With Jon Stewart||Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c|
According to The Los Angeles Times, The Smithsonian Institution says it has no interest in accepting the suit, shirt and tie O.J. Simpson wore on the day he was acquitted of murder in criminal court.
“The Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History will not be collecting O.J. Simpson’s suit,” the museum said in a statement. “The decision was made by the museum’s curators together with the director.” -Shelby Grad /LA Times
Fellow Simpson Trial veteran Linda Deutsch of the AP reports from Santa Monica, that the suit, shirt and tie O.J. Simpson wore when he was acquitted of murder in criminal court will be donated to the Smithsonian Institution.
Simpson was later found liable for the murders of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman in civil court in Santa Monica, and ordered to pay damages in the amount of $33.5 million. Ron Goldman’s father, Fred, has been in a running battle to try and collect the court award. Deutsch reports that Simpson’s former sports agent, Mike Gilbert, who had the clothing, came up with the idea of donating it to the Smithsonian, with no profits going to anybody.
The Smithsonian has not yet agreed to accept the clothing.
Simpson agreed to the deal from a prison cell in Nevada, where he is doing 9 years for robbery and kidnapping in connection with an unrelated case. Mr. Simpson continues to insist he is innocent of killing his ex-wife and Ron Goldman even though he wrote a book entitled “If I Did It,” based upon the idea of how Brown and Goldman were killed. According to Simpson it’s all hypothetical, since he says he was nowhere near the murder scene when it happened.
The rights to the book were awarded to the Goldman family. Apparently, they won’t be getting the suit, shirt and tie. Presumably O.J.’s search for the real killers will continue upon his release.
Animal activists speak out against the continued captivity of Killer Whales in a piece in the Los Angeles Times. This latest round of opposition follows the death of a Sea World trainer on Wednesday.
“……the Humane Society of the United States, didn’t go as far as PETA in condemning SeaWorld but argued that conditions there were insufficient to keep an animal like Tilikum in a healthy mental state. Naomi Rose, a marine mammal scientist for the Humane Society, told the Orlando Sentinel that “[in] terms of his stress levels, his size is a factor,” referencing the orca’s much-publicized 12,000-pound frame. “He is so big, I don’t care how big SeaWorld’s tanks are, they are too small for him.”‘-LA Times
It’s being suggested the orcas could be moved to a transitional coastal marine sanctuary.
photo: kjetil bjornsrud
Al Gore answers climate change skeptics in an op-ed piece “We Can’t Wish Away Climate Change” in the New York Times.
“I, for one, genuinely wish that the climate crisis were an illusion. But unfortunately, the reality of the danger we are courting has not been changed by the discovery of at least two mistakes in the thousands of pages of careful scientific work over the last 22 years by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In fact, the crisis is still growing because we are continuing to dump 90 million tons of global-warming pollution every 24 hours into the atmosphere — as if it were an open sewer.
It is true that the climate panel published a flawed overestimate of the melting rate of debris-covered glaciers in the Himalayas, and used information about the Netherlands provided to it by the government, which was later found to be partly inaccurate. In addition, e-mail messages stolen from the University of East Anglia in Britain showed that scientists besieged by an onslaught of hostile, make-work demands from climate skeptics may not have adequately followed the requirements of the British freedom of information law.
But the scientific enterprise will never be completely free of mistakes. What is important is that the overwhelming consensus on global warming remains unchanged. It is also worth noting that the panel’s scientists — acting in good faith on the best information then available to them — probably underestimated the range of sea-level rise in this century, the speed with which the Arctic ice cap is disappearing and the speed with which some of the large glacial flows in Antarctica and Greenland are melting and racing to the sea.” –Al Gore
That’s according to a new study from the Pew Research Center. The study, “The New News Landscape: Rise Of The Internet” indicates Americans are getting their news from a mix of sources.
“In the digital era, news has become omnipresent. Americans access it in multiple formats on multiple platforms on myriad devices. The days of loyalty to a particular news organization on a particular piece of technology in a particular form are gone. The overwhelming majority of Americans (92%) use multiple platforms to get news on a typical day, including national TV, local TV, the internet, local newspapers, radio and national newspapers. Some 46% of Americans say they get news from four to six media platforms on a typical day. Just 7% get their news from a single media platform on a typical day.
The internet is at the center of the story of how people’s relationship to news is changing. Six in ten Americans (59%) get news from a combination of online and offline sources on a typical day, and the internet is now the third most popular news platform, behind local television news and national television news.” -Pew Center Study
David Swanson, author of the recently published “Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union,” tells “Truthout” that the nation shouldn’t be satisfied to move forward with the idea that we have replaced “a bad dictator with a good dictator….It’s the wrong place to look for a savior,” he says. “We should be looking to ourselves……There’s no question that he (Mr. Obama) committed to progressive ideals and went back on them.”
Swanson’s advice is to forget about the Senate and the President and focus on the House.
Here’s the interview from Truthout.org-
I heard about this in the gym yesterday. I didn’t believe it then and I’m not sure what to think after seeing the video.
The premise for the show “Sports Science” was this: Who is more accurate? New Orleans Quarterback Drew Brees, or an Olympic archer? Their conclusion is that Brees has the greater degree of accuracy.
They had Brees firing a football at an archery target 20 yards away. They compared his accuracy to what appears to have been the average number of hits from archers (they don’t say how many) in the 2008 Olympic Games. I’d like to throw out the average and see Brees going head to head with someone deemed to be the finest archer in the world.
It should also be noted that Olympic archers are trying to hit targets at a distance of 76.5 yards.
Either way, Brees is an amazing QB. But Olympic archers are pretty accurate, too.
See what you think.
It’s a little surprising to find some reporters pointing out this morning that nothing much was accomplished at President Obama’s health care summit with the Republicans (even with the square table the Republicans demanded) without also reporting that nobody really expected anything to come from it.
In case you haven’t been able to figure it out, the Republican Party doesn’t want health care reform. They are trying to do now what they have done in the past, scrap everything that’s been put together and ostensibly “start over” because that, they say, is what the American people want.
Give the Republicans what they want and the result will be the same as it has been in the past. There will be no health care reform at all, which is what the insurance industry has ordered their lapdog Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats to deliver while much of America goes broke trying to pay for health care.
The American people want affordable health care. End of story.
One has no way of knowing what Mr. Obama may be thinking at this point. Some are speculating that he was just letting out more rope, determined to give the Republicans every possible opportunity to add to or amend the bills that have been hammered together, and to do it publicly, so that there will be no doubt as to Republican resolve to kill health care reform regardless of how it’s written. They will have shown their cause to be a ruse, giving Mr. Obama the leverage he needs to move forward without the cooperation or approval of the Republican Party but hopefully with the understanding of the American people.
It’s not for nothing that Mr. Obama mentioned the need to do what must be done and then letting the people register their approval or disapproval at the polls. He was sending a message. Get on board now or sink at the mid-terms.
However, the question of whether he will be able to make it happen remains, with or without the mid-term election.
The degree to which corporate money controls the House and Senate is troubling. Something beyond that is equally disturbing, or should be, to anybody whose head isn’t stuck in the 19th Century.
While watching some of the exchanges from Thursday’s meeting, I had to wonder if some of what was said to the President would have been said in the same fashion and with the same word choice and tone, if Mr. Obama were white. It’s the same uncomfortable feeling I experienced when a United States Congressman shouted out “liar” during Mr. Obama’s speech on health care reform. And again, when some schools across the land refused to let students watch a live speech from the President of the United States encouraging the nation’s schoolchildren to excel. This wasn’t just another political hack who wanted to address the nation’s children. It was the President of the United States of America.
Would any white president be confronted with the kind of disrespect Mr. Obama is being forced to face? The fact that this question even needs asking is an indicator that there’s an elephant in the middle of the room. Nobody wants to admit that it’s there, much less discuss it. It’s there, nevertheless.
To date, former President Jimmy Carter, is among the few who have had the courage to address the issue, speaking out against those who held up signs at rallies portraying the President of the United States as a reincarnation of Hitler while others suggested Mr. Obama should have been buried with President Kennedy.
“It’s a racist attitude, and my hope is and my expectation is that in the future both Democratic leaders and Republican leaders will take the initiative in condemning that kind of unprecedented attack on the president of the United States.” -President Jimmy Carter
The tone and tenor of what’s being said seems to have come down a notch or two since Mr. Carter’s statement in September of last year. However, racism is still racism, regardless of its subtlety.
(Because there are dog-eat-dog, wild-eyed idiots out there who will go on the attack at the drop of a metaphor, I should point out that the elephant mentioned in this post is not meant to represent the Republican Party. It is meant to represent an actual elephant. A large animal that is impossible to ignore, particularly when it’s standing in the middle of the room.)
Democrats and Republicans in the California State Legislature may have finally found something they can agree on. A statewide “Cuss Free Week.” The Assembly, is set to vote on a resolution designating the first week in March as our “Cuss Free Week, when all Californians will be called upon to try and avoid using swear words.
The idea was inspired by a teenager who founded a no-cussing club at his junior high school and was introduced in the Assembly by Anthony Portantino (D-La Canada/Flintridge).
Assemblyman Portantino says his staff plans on delivering “cuss jars” to the offices of all the state lawmakers and the Governor. Anyone who is naughty and uses a bad word will then have to put some money in the “cuss jar.” If they feel like it.
Isn’t that special?
The state is $21 billion in the hole and our legislative hall monitors are fiddling around at the junior high level? Worse than than that, the AP reports that swearing on the floor of the State Assembly is rare. Worse still, this wasn’t even their idea. They had to borrow it from a high school kid.
With endless gridlock along party lines, the U.S. Senate continues to rank among the most dysfunctional, useless and disgusting legislative bodies in the country. The California State Legislature isn’t far behind.
Don’t misunderstand. Cleaning up the country’s language is a good idea. But this is something that belongs where it originated, at the junior high school level.
Stand by for the Assembly’s next big move, an annual sweetfest celebration with legislators running around pinning one another with flowers, chocolates on every desk and a big parade through the streets of Sacramento.
And these people are responsible for overseeing the 8th largest economy in the world.
As for Mr. Portantino, the cost of cleaning up the recent mudslides back in his home district of La Canada/Flintridge, is expected to run somwhere between $20 and $30 million. Los Angeles County Supervisor Mike Antonovich, has raised the question of whether the U.S. Forest Service may have been negligent in not doing more to contain the spreading fire that eventually led to the mudslides. Presume the assemblyman’s got that all worked out?
Chris Matthews has just reported that Rod Blagojevich will be featured at a discussion on ethics at Northwestern University. The event is being billed as “Ethics in Politics: An evening with Former Governor Rod Blagojevich.”
Huh? Where have these people been? Why are they giving this guy yet another forum? What’s next? Sarah Palin on the geopolitical implications of Iran getting the bomb?
Matea Gold reports in the Los Angeles Times, that ABC is preparing to cut its news division by as much as 20%. The new model she reports, will force some of those who remain to act as “one man bands” both shooting and producing their stories.
“The process is expected to begin Wednesday morning when employees receive a letter asking for volunteers to take buyouts and leave the company. Newsroom employees have heard that the network is seeking to shrink the newsroom by as many as 300 positions, about 20% of the 1,400-person staff. If not enough employees volunteer to leave, layoffs are likely to follow.” -LA Times
The so-called “one man bands,” which force fewer people to do more with less and sacrifice journalism for the sake of cost cutting, were once used exclusively in small and medium sized non-union markets and would have been unthinkable at the network level.
The cuts at ABC follow recent cuts by CBS News. Can the elimination of network news be far behind?
What the American public needs is obviously no longer paramount, so why bother? It might even help newspapers regain some of their lost readership, if not with actual newsprint then on the Internet.
Is the responsibility of the networks to provide programming in the public’s “interest, convenience and necessity” anything more than a fading memory? Isn’t allowing the networks to present promotion and entertainment pieces disguised as serious journalism, worse than nothing at all?
Much of the country appears to be in a state of denial. It’s a sort of, “This can’t be happening to us, so let’s pretend it isn’t and eventually everything will be okay” mentality. But it isn’t okay. Far from it. This is not a dress rehearsal and better times may not be just around the corner.
It might take some time to get the Congress up off its collective duff and back in a position where it can actually do something other than refuse to move forward because it might make the other guys look good. Our elected representatives need to start putting the country ahead of party politics.
As Senator Bernie Sanders points out in his piece “The Senate’s Reconcilable Differences” currently featured in “Truthout.”
“Since December of 2007, more than 7 million Americans have lost their jobs; a staggering 17.3 percent of the American workforce is either unemployed or under-employed; and over 6 million Americans have been out of work for more than six months, the highest on record.
In America today we have the most unequal distribution of wealth and income in the industrialized world. With the top 1 percent earning more income than the bottom 50 percent, we have the highest rate of childhood poverty among major countries. About a quarter of our children are dependent on food stamps. Today, as the middle class continues its decline, one in nine families can’t make the minimum payment on their credit cards, and 120,000 Americans are declaring bankruptcy every month.
Sadly, this economic pain didn’t begin when the financial sector nearly collapsed over a year ago. It has been going on for a decade. As the Washington Post reported in January, “The past decade was the worst for the U.S. economy in modern times … It was, according to a wide range of data, a lost decade for American workers … There has been zero net job creation since December 1999 … Middle-income households made less in 2008, when adjusted for inflation, than they did in 1999–and the number is sure to have declined further during a difficult 2009.” -Truthout
A past decade that has been “the worst for the U.S. economy in modern times…”
Let’s see, 8 of those years were dominated by chickenhawks in the White House and a Republican dominated Congress pushing for two wars and a laissez faire economy.
It’s really worked well, hasn’t it? And now when Mr. Obama proposes change with the prospect of improving things for the vast majority of Americans who are being squeezed until they bleed, he is confronted by the “party of no.” Beyond that, he is confronted by members of his own party who have grown politically fat by taking millions in bribe money from corporate interests.
But everything is going to be okay, right? It’s easy to stay in that “never, neverland” of denial, until you or someone you care about loses a job and is suddenly without a paycheck and health insurance. Until you or someone you care about is suddenly face to face with the prospect of depleting their retirement fund just to get by. Provided they even have a retirement fund. Do you think it’s possible for the millionaires in the Senate to begin to relate to the stone cold fear that grips the parents of a family of five who suddenly find themselves without the money to pay the rent and buy food for their kids?
The unemployment rate here in California, currently stands at 12%. That’s what Governor Schwarzenegger said yesterday during an appearance on “This Week” on ABC. He said a few other things too, things about Ike Eisenhower and ancient Egypt that made me take notice, because I had been thinking along exactly the same lines.
The idea of those who are remembered as the world’s great leaders being linked to public building projects popped into my head while watching a documentary on Ramses II. Old Ramses, the archeologists say, was among the great (he may have been the greatest) builders of Egypt. There was no unemployment, just lots of building going on the documentary reported, and what Ramses II accomplished was amazing. Fortunately, some of it is still out there more than three thousand years later. Temples, statuary, buildings representing the physical manifestation of an ancient culture’s spiritual essence. Fast forward to the 1950’s and Ike Eisenhower, the man who put the U.S. to work on what is now our interstate highway system, not to mention bumping up the infrastructure for a whole new country in the wake of World War II. There have been others of course, I simply found it interesting that Mr. Schwarzenegger and I were both thinking about the ancient Egyptians and the parallels between great builders, healthy national economies and being remembered by history.
It seems so simple.
History seems to teach us that putting people to work building the national infrastructure serves to support the economy. Doing nothing, on the other hand, leads to nowhere. An entire decade of going nowhere, with the rich getting richer while the middle class dies a slow death, has gotten us to where we are today.
Imagine if someone could wave a magic wand and actually regulate:
-The banking and finance industry
-Media in the public interest
Oh wait! The Congress has the power to do that, don’t they? And a system to do all that was in place prior to deregulation wasn’t it? And now, with the old regulations struck down, Congress seems to be doing next to nothing for the American people and everything it can for the banking industry and the military-industrial complex.
Speaking of which, Ike Eisenhower’s words continue to echo across the land. Or they should.
“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” –Dwight D. Eisenhower 1961
Of course rebuilding our infrastructure, reforming government and establishing programs that will benefit the people of the United States will be expensive.
And who will pay for all of this, you ask? Who do you think is paying for two wars and our current military deployment in more than 150 countries around the world? We are, friends and neighbors. We are.
The money is there, it is simply a matter of who it is being given to.
Perhaps we would be better off continuing on our current path of massive handouts to banking interests that are “too big to fail” and the nearly unlimited financial support for the military-industrial complex. Perhaps it would be wiser to continue with the policies of the past decade, policies that gave us two wars, a military deployment in more than 150 countries and the worst economy since the Great Depression?
Or we can tell the people in Washington, that unless they go back to work for us, we will throw them all out on their self-serving asses regardless of party affiliation? That seems to be the only message they are going to understand.
Appearing on “This Week” on ABC, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger criticized some of his Republican colleagues for accepting stimulus money from Washington and bragging about the good it’s doing in their home districts, even while they continue attacking the Obama Administration’s stimulus package. According to Mr. Schwarzenegger, stimulus money is responsible for 150,000 jobs in California.
“You have a lot of the Republicans running around and pushing back on the stimulus money and saying this doesn’t create any new jobs,” Schwarzenegger said.
“Then they go out and they do the photo ops and they are posing with the big check and they say ‘Isn’t this great?'”